Klenk v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Olivia Klenk |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2026cv01845 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Darrell A Clay |
| James R Knepp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent is to file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within 60 days from the date of this Order. The Answer must comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and must address all legal issues raised in the petition. Petitioner is to file a Traverse to Return of Writ within 30 days from date Respondent files its Return of Writ. Respondent may file a Sur-Reply within 15 days from the date Petitioner files the Traverse. Respondent should do so only when the Traverse raises issues or arguments that were not originally addressed in the Return of Writ. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 8/6/2026. (R,Ke) |
Filing 4
Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 8/6/2026.(R,Ke)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi. (La,K) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Olivia Klenk. (Rake, Michael) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Olivia Klenk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rake, Michael) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (La,K) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (La,K) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (La,K) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (La,K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Klenk v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Olivia Klenk | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Rake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
