Goldberg v. Maloney et al
| Richard D. Goldberg |
| Timothy P. Maloney and Randall Wellington |
| 4:2003cv02190 |
| October 28, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
FILING ERROR, disregard.Memorandum Opinion Order denying petitioner's Motion to stay (Related Doc # 102 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA) Modified on 4/7/2011 (C,KA).
|
|
Filing
100
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Motion for reconsideration and Request for An Evidentiary Hearing. Related Doc # 97 and denying Motion to stay (Related Doc # 98 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/16/11.(E,P) Modified doc type on 3/18/2011 (R,N).
|
|
Filing
95
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth in the Order, the Court finds that Mr. Goldberg has not established sufficient cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default that bars his claim for lack-of notice. Mr. Goldberg 9;s request for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF # 1 ), is, therefore, DENIED. The Order commanding the Mahoning County Probate Court to vacate Mr. Goldberg's sentences (ECF # 73 ) is rescinded, and Mr. Goldberg is ordered to immediately self-surrender to the Mahoning County Sheriff for the completion of his remaining sentence in the underlying case. Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/10/2011. (K,K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
