Jackson v. Houk
Petitioner: Nathaniel Jackson
Respondent: Marc C. Houk
Case Number: 4:2007cv00880
Filed: March 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Trumbull
Presiding Judge: James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/26/22. This Court DIRECTS Attorney Parker to refile his motion to withdraw as counsel with the Sixth Circuit. 93 (T,A)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 87 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/25/2021 denying Motion to stay (Related Doc # 83 )(S,KM)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 80 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/23/2021. The Court GRANTS Jacksons petition. The Court ISSUES a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254 as to Ground 30 and remands to the state trial court for resentencing. re 14 (S,KM)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 78 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/9/2020. The Court denies petitioner's Motion for discovery without prejudice (Related Doc # 74 )(S,KM)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/20/17. IMPORTANT: The Court orders petitioner to file a proposed amended § 2254 petition by 1/31/18 for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Docs. 57 and 59 ) (D,MA)
September 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/8/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants petitioner's motion for a continuance of the stay of his federal habeas corpus claims. (Related Doc. 50 ) (D,MA)
April 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/18/08 granting petitioner's motion to hold this federal habeas proceeding in abeyance until the state court proceedings have been fully exhausted. Immediately upon the exhaustion of his state court remedies, the petitioner is instructed to notify this Court so that it may lift the stay and proceed with this habeas action. (Related Doc. 28 ) (M,G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Houk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathaniel Jackson
Represented By: John P. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marc C. Houk
Represented By: Stephen E. Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?