Board of Commissioners for Trumbull County, Ohio v. Village of Lordstown, Ohio et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Board of Commissioners for Trumbull County, Ohio v. Village of Lordstown, Ohio et al

Board of Commissioners for Trumbull County, Ohio v. Village of Lordstown, Ohio et al

Case Number:	4:2009cv00249
Filed:	February 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Other Statutory Actions Office
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Economus
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Petition for Removal

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2014	Filing 109 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Viewing Plaintiff's probative evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, Defendant City of Warren's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40 ) is g ranted; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against the City of Warren (ECF No. 46 ) is denied; Plaintiff's Modified Motion for Summary Judgment Against the Village of Lordstown, Ohio (ECF No. 72 ) is denied; and Defendant Village of Lordstown, Ohio's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/1/2014. (JLG)
October 30, 2009	Filing 31 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff is hereby compelled to further supplement those responses which are still insufficient despite the supplemental responses. In light of the extended period of time during which Defendant Village of Lords town's discovery requests have been pending and in accordance with F.R.C.P. 33(b)(2), Plaintiff's further supplemental responses also should be provided in an expedited manner. See Order for details. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/30/2009. (S,L)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2014

Filing 109 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Viewing Plaintiff's probative evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, Defendant City of Warren's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40 ) is g ranted; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against the City of Warren (ECF No. 46 ) is denied; Plaintiff's Modified Motion for Summary Judgment Against the Village of Lordstown, Ohio (ECF No. 72 ) is denied; and Defendant Village of Lordstown, Ohio's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 77 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/1/2014. (JLG)

October 30, 2009

Filing 31 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff is hereby compelled to further supplement those responses which are still insufficient despite the supplemental responses. In light of the extended period of time during which Defendant Village of Lords town's discovery requests have been pending and in accordance with F.R.C.P. 33(b)(2), Plaintiff's further supplemental responses also should be provided in an expedited manner. See Order for details. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/30/2009. (S,L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board of Commissioners for Trumbull County, Ohio v. Village of Lordstown, Ohio et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?