Rodriguez-Baron v. Hall

Rodriguez-Baron v. Hall

Petitioner:	Armando Caesar Rodriguez-Baron
Respondent:	Richard Hall
Case Number:	4:2009cv01594
Filed:	July 13, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Youngstown Office
County:	Mahoning
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	William H. Baughman
Presiding Judge:	Patricia A. Gaughan
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 18, 2010	Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied in part and dismissed in part. Furthermore, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/18/10. (LC,S) re 9
July 27, 2010	Filing 9 Report and Recommendation that Rodriguez-Baron's petition be denied in part and dismissed in part (Related Doc # 1 ). Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2010. Referral Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 07/27/2010. (Hard copy mailed to petitioner on 07/27/2010.) (G,GS)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 18, 2010

Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied in part and dismissed in part. Furthermore, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/18/10. (LC,S) re 9

July 27, 2010

Filing 9 Report and Recommendation that Rodriguez-Baron's petition be denied in part and dismissed in part (Related Doc # 1 ). Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2010. Referral Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 07/27/2010. (Hard copy mailed to petitioner on 07/27/2010.) (G,GS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez-Baron v. Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Armando Caesar Rodriguez-Baron
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?