Taylor v. Mahoning County Children Services Board et al
Plaintiff: Douglas B. Taylor
Defendant: Mahoning County Children Services Board, Cedric E. Henderson, John Joe, Paula Poe and Richard Roe
Case Number: 4:2011cv00028
Filed: January 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Mahoning
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons stated, Defendant Henderson's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32 ) is granted. The Eighth Amendment § 1983 and R.C. 2307.60 claims are dismissed. Plaintiff is to amend his complaint consistent with this Memorandum of Opinion and Order no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. The assault and battery (Count I), Fourteenth Amendment § 1983 (Count VI), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count VIII) claims against Henderson shall proceed to trial. Defendant Mahoning County Children Services Board, Wainwright, and Vechiarelli's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in its entirety. ECF No. 33 . Defendants Mahoning County Children Services Board, Wainwright, and Vechiarelli shall be dismissed as parties to this suit. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/13/2012. (S,L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Mahoning County Children Services Board et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas B. Taylor
Represented By: William E. Pfau, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mahoning County Children Services Board
Represented By: Daniel T. Downey
Represented By: James Q. Dorgan
Represented By: Craig G Pelini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cedric E. Henderson
Represented By: James Q. Dorgan
Represented By: Daniel T. Downey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Joe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paula Poe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Roe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?