Macedo v. Rushing et al
| Gregorio Macedo |
| Jillian Shane, William Zeyer, Nilsa Diaz, Roddie Rushing and Heidi Mayer |
| 4:2011cv00175 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons stated, the Court grants Defendant William Zeyer's Motion to Dismiss, Defendants Nilsa Diaz's Motion to Dismiss, denies pro se Plaintiff Gregorio Macedos Motion for Summary Judgment, and d enies Defendant Zeyer's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Traverse. The claims against Zeyer and Diaz are dismissed with prejudice. The Court also observes that Defendant Heidi Mayer has not been served in this cause of action. The Court dismisses without prejudice Macedo's claim against Meyer. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/31/2012. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
6
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Rushing and Shane are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. This case shall proceed solely on Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Zeyer, Diaz, and Mayer. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/5/2011. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
