Roper v. Does et al
| Roberto Roper |
| John Does, D. Brammer, R. Lepiane, J. Ward, V. Siha, C. McDonnell, Medical Personnel Elkton FCI Health Department and United States of America |
| 4:2011cv00415 |
| February 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Columbiana |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's 54 Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/3/2013. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
50
Order Adopting Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert's Report and Recommendation (Related document 49 ). Defendants D. Brammer and R. Lepianes and Defendant the United States of Americas motions to dismiss are granted. (Related document {34] and 33 ). Pro se Plaintiff Robert Ropers Complaint is dismissed. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/30/12. (BR,S)
|
|
Filing
12
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court orders that Plaintiff is to provide U.S. Marshal forms and summonses for each Defendant and any other party requiring service of process of the Complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order. Plaintif f is ordered to send a Notice of Compliance with an appropriate case caption for filing, with the completed form. The Clerk's office is directed to mail the appropriate forms to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order 1 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/16/11. (BR,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
