Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron v. Youngstown Associates in Radiology, Inc. Welfare Plan, et al
| Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron |
| Youngstown Associates in Radiology, Inc. Welfare Plan, Youngstown Associates in Radiology Inc. and Professional Risk Management |
| 4:2011cv00506 |
| March 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court holds that Children's Hospital lacks standing. In addition, the Court incorporates its prior ruling that the Plan Administrator did not arbitrarily and capriciously deny coverage for B.W.'s treatment in light of the plain language in the Plan. ECF No. 62 . Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/21/2018. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
62
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Plan Administrator did not arbitrarily and capriciously deny coverage for B.W.'s treatment in light of the plain language in the Plan. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/31/2014. Related document(s) 50 . (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
