James R. Grope, III v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company
| James R Grope III |
| The Ohio Bell Telephone Company |
| 4:2011cv02293 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Summary Judgment Order (related document 59 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson 12/30/2014. (R,Li)
|
|
Filing
57
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53 ) in its entirety. The matter is set for trial on 11/3/2014 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/28/2014. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
48
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Rule 59(e) Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 38 ) is granted in that the Court has conducted an oral hearing and reconsidered its earlier ruling. The Court 9;s ruling, however, remains unchanged. Defendant's request to dismiss Plaintiff's claims on the basis of judicial estoppel is denied. Defendant's Alternative Motion for Certification and Stay to File Interlocutory Appeal is also denied. The case management schedule resumes as suggested by the Parties' Proposed Pre-trial Schedule (ECF No. 36 ) and adopted by the Court. See Order (ECF No. 37 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/9/2013. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James R. Grope, III v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James R Grope III | |
| Represented By: | Martin S. Hume |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Ohio Bell Telephone Company | |
| Represented By: | Laura A. Lindner |
| Represented By: | Amy Ryder Wentz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
