Tate v. Cook
Plaintiff: Ola Tate
Defendant: Lori Cook
Case Number: 4:2011cv02730
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Trumbull
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the United State's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6 ). The claims against the United States are dismissed without prejudice. The matter is closed on the docket of the undersigned. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/28/2012. (S,L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tate v. Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ola Tate
Represented By: John P. Lutseck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Cook
Represented By: David Augustin Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?