Exal Corporation et al v. Roeslein & Associates
Plaintiff: Exal Corporation and C2C Aluminum Technology Corporation
Defendant: Roeslein & Associates, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2012cv01830
Filed: July 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Mahoning
Presiding Judge: Kathleen B. Burke
Presiding Judge: David D. Dowd
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 149 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court hereby denies Roeslein's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count VI, Exal's claim for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and grants the motion as to Exal's remaining claims. Count VI will proceed to trial. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/17/2015. Related document(s) 137 , 147 . (JLG)
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 119 Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant Roselein's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1, 2 and 8 of the Second Amended Complaint. The Court grants Roesleins motion as to Counts 1 and 8 and dismisses those Counts. The Court denies Roesleins motion as to Count 2. Related document, 104 Sealed Motion. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/27/2013.(R,Sh)
October 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Memorandum Opinion Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts II, VI and VII; and Granting Defendant's Motion for a more Definite Statement as to Count II only. Plaintiffs have until October 16, 2012 to file an amended complaint; the amended complaint must amend Count II, and may amend any other portion of the complaint. (Related Doc # 19 and Related Doc # 20 ). Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 10/2/2012. (M,De)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Exal Corporation et al v. Roeslein & Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Exal Corporation
Represented By: Chet J. Bonner
Represented By: R. Cameron Garrison
Represented By: Travis W. McCallon
Represented By: Luke M. Meriwether
Represented By: Jennifer Buckey Wick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C2C Aluminum Technology Corporation
Represented By: Chet J. Bonner
Represented By: R. Cameron Garrison
Represented By: Travis W. McCallon
Represented By: Luke M. Meriwether
Represented By: Jennifer Buckey Wick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roeslein & Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Jeremy Gilman
Represented By: Jan P. Miller
Represented By: Nicole D. Schaefer
Represented By: Steven M. Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?