Li v. Jiang et al
| Min Li |
| Qi Jiang and Youngstown State University |
| 4:2013cv02435 |
| October 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 50 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/29/2016. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
15
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF No. [4.] The Court grants Li's Motion to Supplement Complaint Ins tanter, ECF No. 10 . Accordingly, Li's Title VII claim against Jiang is dismissed with prejudice; all state law claims against YSU and Jiang are dismissed without prejudice; Li's section 1983 claims against YSU and Jiang in her offici al capacity are dismissed with prejudice; Jiang is not entitled to qualified immunity on Li's section 1983 claim against Jiang in her individual capacity; and to the extent Li asserts independent legal claims of respondeat superior and punitive damages, these claims are dismissed. The case will proceed solely on Li's Title VII claim against YSU and Li's section 1983 claim against Jiang in her individual capacity. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/13/2014. Related document(s) 4 , 10 . (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
