Sidikov v. Pugh, et al
Dilshod Sidikov |
Maksym Devyatin, Hector L. Feliciano, Patrick J. Donlin, Jr., Edward Larue, David M. Toepfer, United States Marshal and Michael Pugh |
4:2014cv00451 |
February 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Youngstown Office |
Mahoning |
Solomon Oliver |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 5/14/2014. (D,M) |
Filing 5 ORDER: In accordance w/the Memoramdum filed previously as separate docket entry #4, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Petitioner is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the sole purpose of the filing of this action with this Court. The Clerk of Court i s directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.Based on the Court's conclusion, there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/26/14. (km) [Transferred from pamd on 2/26/2014.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.