Manigault v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
Khristan Manigault |
Sharon Chilson, State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Cheri Raber and Natalie Bryant |
4:2014cv00585 |
March 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Youngstown Office |
Trumbull |
Benita Y. Pearson |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court dismisses for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Plaintiffs first, fourth, and fifth causes of action against ODRC, and Plaintiffs second, third, fifth, and sixth causes of action against Chilson, Rabe r, and Bryant sued in their official capacities. Plaintiffs second, third, fifth, and sixth causes of action proceed against Chilson, Raber, and Bryant sued in their individual capacities. Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is converted , in part, to a motion for summary judgment. Defendants shall file, not later than fourteen days from the date of this Order, supplemental brief(s) in support of their motion for summary judgment. Fourteen days after Defendants submission(s), Plain tiff shall respond. Defendants may reply seven days later. If the parties desire a different briefing schedule, they shall consult and jointly propose a modified schedule not later than September 26, 2014. Related document 8 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/19/2014.(R,Li) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.