Butler et al v. Hotel California, Inc. et al.
Richard A. Butler, III and Ocean Avenue Properties, LLC |
Hotel California, Inc. and Sebastian Rucci |
4:2014cv02380 |
October 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Youngstown Office |
Mahoning |
John R. Adams |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated in the Order, Plaintiffs' 3 motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief is GRANTED in part. Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Reg ister to Transact Business is DENIED as moot. Defendants' 39 Motion to Continue the Preliminary Injunction Hearing is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' 41 Motion to Supplement Robert J. Herbeger's Declaration is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to cease all use of "Hotel California" and/or "The Hotel California" in all print, internet-based, and other advertising. Defendants have fourteen days, until June 10, 2015, to comply with this order. See Order for complete details. Judge John R. Adams on 05/26/2015. (M,TL) |
Filing 27 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 3 ), granting Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their motion for TRO (Doc. # 14 ), and denying Defendants' motions for leave to respond as moot (Doc. # 23 and # 25 ). See order for addition instruction. Judge John R. Adams on 3/30/15. (K,C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.