Talmer Bank and Trust v. Kausmeyer

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Talmer Bank and Trust v. Kausmeyer

Talmer Bank and Trust v. Kausmeyer

Plaintiff:	Talmer Bank and Trust
Defendant:	Gary Kausmeyer
Case Number:	4:2015cv01850
Filed:	September 10, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Youngstown Office
County:	Trumbull
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1330
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 9, 2016	Filing 98 Memorandum of Opinion and Order for the reasons set forth herein Plaintiff's 69 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Other Claims Asserted Against Talmer is granted. Plaintiff's 70 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regardin g the Validity of the CICS Agreement is granted. Plaintiff's 71 Motion in Limine to Limit Admission of Evidence Regarding Alleged Fraud is denied. Plaintiff's 75 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to Expense Reimbursement i s denied. Plaintiff's 76 Motion in Limine Regarding References to Plaintiff's Name at Trial is granted. Defendant's 88 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to Defendant's Job Performance is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/9/2016. (E,CK)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 9, 2016

Filing 98 Memorandum of Opinion and Order for the reasons set forth herein Plaintiff's 69 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Other Claims Asserted Against Talmer is granted. Plaintiff's 70 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regardin g the Validity of the CICS Agreement is granted. Plaintiff's 71 Motion in Limine to Limit Admission of Evidence Regarding Alleged Fraud is denied. Plaintiff's 75 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to Expense Reimbursement i s denied. Plaintiff's 76 Motion in Limine Regarding References to Plaintiff's Name at Trial is granted. Defendant's 88 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to Defendant's Job Performance is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/9/2016. (E,CK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Talmer Bank and Trust v. Kausmeyer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Talmer Bank and Trust
Represented By:	Martin J. Mackowski, III
Represented By:	Robert F. Ware
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Kausmeyer
Represented By:	Joshua R. Cohen
Represented By:	Ellen M. Kramer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?