Harris v. United States of America et al
| Keelan Harris |
| United States of America, Loretta E. Lynch, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood, R. Hansen, Bill Story, Steven Grimm, Glen Johnson, Marilou Burns, John Kasich, Mike DeWine, Anthony J. Dattillio, James A Fredericka, Emily Clark Weston and Thomas M. Baronzzi |
| 4:2016cv00270 |
| February 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Columbiana |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting the Federal and State Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, the County Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and the State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ECF Nos. 41 , 42 , 44 . Plaintiff's Motions to Amend and to Appoint Counsel are denied. ECF Nos. 34 , 40 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/21/2017(C,KA)
|
|
Filing
7
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed as against the United States, United States Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and BOP Director Charles Samuel, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. & #167;§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this dismissal could not be taken in good faith. This action may proceed as against all of the remaining defendants. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/11/2016. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
