Spivey v. Jenkins

Spivey v. Jenkins

Petitioner:	Warren Spivey
Respondent:	Charlotte Jenkins
Case Number:	4:2016cv00384
Filed:	February 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Youngstown Office
County:	Mahoning
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2017	Filing 53 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, this Court denies Petitioner Spivey's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 38 ). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), th at an appeal from this decision could be taken in good faith as to Spivey's first, fourth, and seventh (sub-claims (a) through (c)) grounds for relief, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) as to those claims only. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Court also denies Spivey's Motion for Discovery (ECF No. 48 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/30/2017. (JLG)
March 24, 2017	Filing 36 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's Motion to Amend Habeas Petition with Additional Claims (ECF No. 27 ) is granted. Spivey shall forthwith file his Amended Petition. Respondent shall file an Am ended Return of Writ no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. Petitioner's Motion to Hold Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Abeyance Pending Exhaustion of Newly Discovered Evidence Being Presented to State Court (ECF No. 32 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/24/2017. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2017

Filing 53 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, this Court denies Petitioner Spivey's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 38 ). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), th at an appeal from this decision could be taken in good faith as to Spivey's first, fourth, and seventh (sub-claims (a) through (c)) grounds for relief, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) as to those claims only. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Court also denies Spivey's Motion for Discovery (ECF No. 48 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/30/2017. (JLG)

March 24, 2017

Filing 36 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's Motion to Amend Habeas Petition with Additional Claims (ECF No. 27 ) is granted. Spivey shall forthwith file his Amended Petition. Respondent shall file an Am ended Return of Writ no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. Petitioner's Motion to Hold Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Abeyance Pending Exhaustion of Newly Discovered Evidence Being Presented to State Court (ECF No. 32 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/24/2017. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spivey v. Jenkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Warren Spivey
Represented By:	John Q. Lewis
Represented By:	Vicki R.A. Werneke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Charlotte Jenkins
Represented By:	Brenda S. Leikala
Represented By:	Katherine E. Mullin
Represented By:	Charles L. Wille
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?