Lemons v. Watkins et al
| Charles Lemons, III |
| Dennis Watkins, Gina Buccino Arnaut and Emanuel Nites |
| 4:2016cv02793 |
| November 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Trumbull |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No. 11 ) is denied. Furthermore, Plaintiff is enjoined from filing additional post judgment motions in this case. The Clerk is directed to return, unfiled, any further motions submitted by Plaintiff for filing in this action. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this order could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/24/2017. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
5
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's conviction has not been overturned. Indeed, he is still incarcerated and serving a fifty-eight year sentence. Therefore, Plaintiff cannot proceed with his cla im in a § 1983 action. Accordingly, this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/30/2017. (E,CK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
