Ojose v. Youngstown State University

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Ojose v. Youngstown State University

Ojose v. Youngstown State University

Plaintiff:	Bobby Ojose
Defendant:	Youngstown State University
Case Number:	4:2016cv02952
Filed:	December 8, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Youngstown Office
County:	Mahoning
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 6, 2019	Filing 88 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants Marcia Matanin and Charles Howell's Motion to Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (ECF No. 80 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/6/2019. (JLG)
March 29, 2018	Filing 69 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Pending before the Court is Defendants Marcia Matanin, James Tressel, Martin Abraham, Charles Howell, Kevin Reynolds, Cynthia Kravitz, and Ken Learman's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF No. 48 . The Court converts Defendants' motion from a Rule 12 motion to a Rule 56 motion. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' motion. It is granted in all respects, except for Plaintiff's Equal Protection claims against Howell and Matanin. To the extent the motion is denied, it is denied without prejudice to refiling as a Rule 56 motion, upon completion of any remaining discovery. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/29/2018. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 6, 2019

Filing 88 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants Marcia Matanin and Charles Howell's Motion to Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (ECF No. 80 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/6/2019. (JLG)

March 29, 2018

Filing 69 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Pending before the Court is Defendants Marcia Matanin, James Tressel, Martin Abraham, Charles Howell, Kevin Reynolds, Cynthia Kravitz, and Ken Learman's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF No. 48 . The Court converts Defendants' motion from a Rule 12 motion to a Rule 56 motion. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' motion. It is granted in all respects, except for Plaintiff's Equal Protection claims against Howell and Matanin. To the extent the motion is denied, it is denied without prejudice to refiling as a Rule 56 motion, upon completion of any remaining discovery. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/29/2018. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ojose v. Youngstown State University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby Ojose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Youngstown State University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?