Patricia Garcar v. City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
| Patricia Garcar |
| City of Youngstown, Ohio, Robin Lees, Robin Foley and John Doe |
| 4:2017cv01698 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, all John Doe Defendants are dismissed as parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. In addition, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 34 ) is granted in part an d denied in part. Specifically, summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants on the following claims: (1) federal-law hostile work environment between 2011 and 2014, (2) state-law invasion of privacy for the March 2014 disclosure of medical in formation, (3) federal- and state-law sex discrimination based on the July 2014 transfer to the Family Service Investigation Unit, (4) federal- and state-law discrimination based on the February 2015 promotion and demotion, (5) federal- and state-law retaliation based on the February 2015 promotion and demotion, (6) federal- and state-law retaliation based on the March 2015 discipline, (7) First Amendment retaliation based on the October 2017 discipline, and (8) state-law intentional infliction of emotional distress. The following claims shall persist: (1) state-law hostile work environment between August 15, 2011, and mid-2014, (2) federal- and state-law retaliation based on the July 2014 transfer to the Family Service Investigation Unit, and (3) federal- and state-law Title VII and Chapter 4112 retaliation based on the October 2017 discipline. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/28/2019. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
27
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleading (ECF No. 19 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint by Monday, 4/23/2018. Defendants shall respond within 14 days of the filing. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/20/2018. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
22
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 20 ) is denied. Given the denial of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 20 ), Plaintiff's counsel declared that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 20 ) is moot. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 20 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/23/2018. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
