U.V.A. Vaduz v. Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff: U.V.A. Vaduz
Defendant: Republic of Argentina
Case Number: 4:2017mc00019
Filed: March 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
Presiding Judge: Donald C Nugent
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2017 Filing 1 Certificate of Judgment for Registration in Another District received from Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:07cv11497, entered on 10/21/2008 against Republic of Argentina in the amount of $6,867,632.00 and $1,881,766.32. Filing fee $47, receipt #14660094030. (Attachments: #1 Judgment) (S,SR)
March 31, 2017 Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (S,SR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.V.A. Vaduz v. Republic of Argentina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.V.A. Vaduz
Represented By: William A. Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Republic of Argentina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?