Pittman v. Matalco (U.S.), Inc.

Pittman v. Matalco (U.S.), Inc.

Plaintiff:	Ricky Pittman
Defendant:	Matalco (U.S.), Inc.
Case Number:	4:2018cv00203
Filed:	January 26, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Youngstown Office
County:	Trumbull
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2018	Filing 30 Memorandum of Opinion and Order The parties' proposed FLSA settlement agreement is approved because it is fair and reasonable, and it shall remain sealed unless it becomes necessary to unseal the agreement at a future time. At the parti es' request, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), the action is dismissed with prejudice. Except as provided in the settlement agreement, the parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/13/2018. Related document(s) 1 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 27 , 29 . (JLG) Modified text on 12/13/2018 (JLG).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2018

Filing 30 Memorandum of Opinion and Order The parties' proposed FLSA settlement agreement is approved because it is fair and reasonable, and it shall remain sealed unless it becomes necessary to unseal the agreement at a future time. At the parti es' request, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), the action is dismissed with prejudice. Except as provided in the settlement agreement, the parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/13/2018. Related document(s) 1 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 27 , 29 . (JLG) Modified text on 12/13/2018 (JLG).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pittman v. Matalco (U.S.), Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricky Pittman
Represented By:	Chastity L. Christy
Represented By:	Lori M. Griffin
Represented By:	Anthony J. Lazzaro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Matalco (U.S.), Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?