Manley v. Hughes et al
| Rammie Manley |
| L. Hughes, M. Filipowicz, Jo Hall, J. Seech, W. Wine, J. Shannon, M Williams, T. Dotson, M. Stevens, M. Robinson and Ohio Department of Correction & Rehab |
| 4:2018cv01431 |
| June 25, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Sara Lioi |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and adopts the same, except to the extent it implies or suggests that one or more of the Escort Officers did, in fact, violate Manleys constitutional rights du ring the escort, as that is an issue for a factfinder to decide. Accordingly, defendants motion for summary judgment is: (1) GRANTED as to Manleys allegations against all defendants for acts committed leading up to and during his extraction from his cell; and (2) GRANTED as to all defendants, except Williams, Shannon, and Filipowicz, as to Manleys allegation that an officer intentionally injured his finger while he was being escorted to R&D. The case will proceed solely against defendants Willia ms, Shannon, and Filipowicz as to this allegation. Finally, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1), the Court may appoint an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel. The issues presented for trial in this case are sufficiently complex that pro se plaintiff Manley would benefit from counsel. As such, the Court would consider a request from Manley for an attorney to represent him in this matter. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/31/2019. (D,N)
|
|
Filing
10
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court dismisses the plaintiff's complaint against the Ohio Department of Correction & Rehab pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915(A). This action shall proceed against the remaining defend ants: L. Hughes, W. Wine, M. Filipowicz, Jo Hall, J. Seech, J. Shannon, M. Williams, T. Dotson, M. Stevens, and M. Robinson. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process upon the defendants listed above, and a copy of this Order shall be included in the documents served. The Court further certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Doc. No. 1 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 9/21/2018. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting and affirming 6 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/25/18. (jk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)[Transferred from ohsd on 6/25/2018.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
