Marchionda et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
| Dominic Marchionda and Jacqueline Marchionda |
| Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 4:2018cv01572 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| John R Adams |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Mahoning County, case number 17 cv 03265 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8797472. Filed by Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Luschin, Ian) |
| Copy of Notice of Failure to File Corporate Disclosure Statement, #2 Magistrate Consent Form Issued mailed to Dominic Marchionda and Jacqueline Marchionda at 7886 Via Attilio Poland, OH 44514 on 7/10/2018. (S,SR) |
| Notice by Clerk that Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,SR) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
