Buckeye Polymers, Inc. et al v. Bunting Magnetics Co.
BPI Recycling, LLC and Buckeye Polymers, Inc. |
Bunting Magnetics Co. |
Varilease Finance, Inc. |
4:2019cv01256 |
May 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Benita Y Pearson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Supplement to Notice of Removal, - Exhibit 3 - Defendant's Request for Extension of Time to Move or Plead Pursuant to Local Rule 6(B), filed by Bunting Magnetics Co.. Related document(s) #1 . (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,Ke) |
Filing 3 Supplement to Notice of Removal, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Bunting Magnetics Co.. Related document(s) #1 . (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bunting Magnetics Co.. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CV-00856 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9339419.. Filed by Bunting Magnetics Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Docket) (Friesen, Brendon) |
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (S,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.