Hamlin v. Gorant Chocolatier, LLC
Plaintiff: Helen Hamlin
Defendant: Gorant Chocolatier, LLC
Case Number: 4:2020cv00117
Filed: January 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Lupo, Kenneth)
March 13, 2020 Filing 8 Answer to #7 Amended complaint filed by Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Lupo, Kenneth)
February 28, 2020 Filing 7 First Amended complaint against Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. Filed by Helen Hamlin. (Draher, Shannon)
February 24, 2020 Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with Telephonic Case Management Conference to be held on 4/1/2020 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Benita Y. Pearson. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference call and contact Chambers directly at 330-884-7435, with all participants on the line. The Court requires personal participation of parties at the Case Management Conference, even when the conference is telephonic. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment No. 1, #2 Attachment No. 2, #3 Attachment No. 3, #4 Attachment No. 4, #5 Attachment No. 5) (JLG)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Marginal Order approving Defendant's #4 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time until 3/2/2020 to Answer. All future requests for extension of time shall be made by motion. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/10/2020. (JLG)
February 7, 2020 Filing 4 Stipulated Motion for extension of time until 3/2/2020 to answer filed by Defendant Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (S,Ke)
January 29, 2020 Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Gorant Chocolatier, LLC on 1/27/2020, filed on behalf of Helen Hamlin (M,R)
January 24, 2020 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Gorant Chocolatier, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1640 0001 1123 3546. (W,K)
January 17, 2020 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Attachment(s): #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,K)
January 17, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9732251.. Filed by Helen Hamlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A - Consent) (Draher, Shannon)
January 17, 2020 Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (S,Ke)
January 17, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,Ke)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamlin v. Gorant Chocolatier, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gorant Chocolatier, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helen Hamlin
Represented By: Hans A. Nilges
Represented By: Shannon M. Draher
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Moyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?