Hamlin v. Gorant Chocolatier, LLC
Helen Hamlin |
Gorant Chocolatier, LLC |
4:2020cv00117 |
January 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Benita Y Pearson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Lupo, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 Answer to #7 Amended complaint filed by Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Lupo, Kenneth) |
Filing 7 First Amended complaint against Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. Filed by Helen Hamlin. (Draher, Shannon) |
Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with Telephonic Case Management Conference to be held on 4/1/2020 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Benita Y. Pearson. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference call and contact Chambers directly at 330-884-7435, with all participants on the line. The Court requires personal participation of parties at the Case Management Conference, even when the conference is telephonic. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment No. 1, #2 Attachment No. 2, #3 Attachment No. 3, #4 Attachment No. 4, #5 Attachment No. 5) (JLG) |
Filing 5 Marginal Order approving Defendant's #4 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time until 3/2/2020 to Answer. All future requests for extension of time shall be made by motion. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/10/2020. (JLG) |
Filing 4 Stipulated Motion for extension of time until 3/2/2020 to answer filed by Defendant Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (S,Ke) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Gorant Chocolatier, LLC on 1/27/2020, filed on behalf of Helen Hamlin (M,R) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Gorant Chocolatier, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1640 0001 1123 3546. (W,K) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. (Attachment(s): #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,K) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Gorant Chocolatier, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9732251.. Filed by Helen Hamlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A - Consent) (Draher, Shannon) |
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (S,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hamlin v. Gorant Chocolatier, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Gorant Chocolatier, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Helen Hamlin | |
Represented By: | Hans A. Nilges |
Represented By: | Shannon M. Draher |
Represented By: | Jeffrey J. Moyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.