Fiffer v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Tajanna Fiffer |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
4:2020cv00643 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Thomas M Parker |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of the Social Security Administration c/o U.S. Attorney on 3/31/2020; by FedEx upon Attorney General on 4/1/2020 (unsigned, marked COVID 19); by FedEx upon Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 4/1/2020 filed on behalf of Tajanna Fiffer. Related document(s) #6 . (J,G) Modified text on 4/14/2020 (P, S). |
Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 3/30/2020. (D,JJ) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 3/30/2020. (D,JJ) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,Ke) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Tajanna Fiffer. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Tajanna Fiffer. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (S,Ke) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (S,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fiffer v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tajanna Fiffer | |
Represented By: | Marcia W. Margolius |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.