Hill v. Shoop
Petitioner: Danny Hill
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Case Number: 4:2020cv01294
Filed: June 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2020 Filing 8 Reply to #7 Response to #6 Motion to to transfer 2254 to the Sixth Circuit as a second petition filed by Timothy Shoop. (Maher, Stephen)
July 9, 2020 Filing 7 Response to #6 Motion to to transfer 2254 to the Sixth Circuit as a second petition filed by Danny Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Order Granting Leave, #2 Exhibit 2. Bitemark Manual, #3 Exhibit 3. State v. Denton)(Werneke, Vicki)
June 25, 2020 Filing 6 Motion to transfer 2254 to the Sixth Circuit as a second petition filed by Respondent Timothy Shoop. Related document(s) #1 . (Maher, Stephen)
June 17, 2020 Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Stephen E. Maher filed by on behalf of Timothy Shoop. (Maher, Stephen)
June 12, 2020 Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (W,K)
June 12, 2020 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody filed by Petitioner Danny Hill. Related document #1 . (Werneke, Vicki) Modified on 6/12/2020 to terminate Motion (W,K).
June 12, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Danny Lee Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Inmate Statement)(Werneke, Vicki)
June 12, 2020 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. . Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Danny Lee Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. 10/3/16 Court of Common Pleas Order, #2 Exhibit 2. State v. Hill, 125 N.E.3d 158 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018), #3 Exhibit 3. State v. Hill, 156 Ohio St.3d 1405 (Ohio 2019), #4 Exhibit 4. 2014 Affdavit of Dr. Franklin Wright, #5 Exhibit 5. Affidavit of Dr. Ian Petty, #6 Exhibit 6. Affidavit of Dr. Zhongxue Hua, #7 Exhibit 7. Affidavit of Dr. Debra Davis, #8 Exhibit 8. Order granting leave to file Motion for New Trial, #9 Exhibit 9. Affidavit of Roger Bauer, #10 Exhibit 10. ABFO Flow Chart, #11 Exhibit 11. 2020 Declaration of Dr. Franklin Wright, #12 Exhibit 12. American Board of Forensic Odontology, Inc. Diplomates Reference Manual, #13 Exhibit 13. 2016 Affidavit of Dr. Lowell Levine, #14 Exhibit 14. Affidavit of Dr. Stephen Greenspan, #15 Exhibit 15. Journal Entry 5/27/2017) (Werneke, Vicki)
June 12, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (W,K)
June 12, 2020 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (W,K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Shoop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Danny Hill
Represented By: Lori B. Riga
Represented By: Vicki R.A. Werneke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Represented By: Stephen E. Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?