Cochran v. Williams
Petitioner: Larry Cochran
Respondent: Warden Mark K. Williams
Case Number: 4:2020cv01943
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 Motion (Request) for a Forthwith Ruling Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(S,Ke)
October 23, 2020 Filing 8 Supplement (Civil Cover Sheet) filed by Larry Cochran. Related document #1 . (Attachments: #1 transmittal letter, #2 envelope)(R,Li)
October 16, 2020 Filing 7 Emergency Motion (Request) for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. (S,Ke)
October 5, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Intent to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Larry Cochran. (M,R)
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 FILING ERROR Notice of Intent to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Larry Cochran. (M,R) Modified on 10/5/2020 to denote filing error (M,R).
August 31, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Court to Direct Clerk to Request All Petitioner's Account Information filed by Larry Cochran. (S,Ke) Modified text on 9/1/2020 (S,SR).
August 31, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Waiver of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by Larry Cochran. (S,Ke) Modified text on 9/1/2020 (S,SR).
August 31, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Inmate Inquiry)(S,Ke)
August 31, 2020 Filing 1 Emergency Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Larry Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Detailed Account of Cochran's Compassionate Release Request with the B.O.P., #2 Exhibit B - B.O.P. Incident Report, #3 Exhibit C - B.O.P. DHO Report, #4 Exhibit D - Accuser's Evidence, #5 Exhibit E - B.O.P. Program Statement No. 5050.50, Compassionate Release, Section 8. Approval of Request and Section 9. Denial of Request Document #7, Email Request to Staff Document #8) (S,Ke)
August 31, 2020 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (S,Ke)
August 31, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,Ke)
August 31, 2020 Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a)., Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Larry Cochran #08893-027, ELKTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P.O. BOX 10, LISBON, OH 44432 on 9/1/2020. Related document(s) #1 . (S,Ke)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cochran v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Cochran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Mark K. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?