Cochran v. Williams
Larry Cochran |
Warden Mark K. Williams |
4:2020cv01943 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Solomon Oliver |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Motion (Request) for a Forthwith Ruling Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(S,Ke) |
Filing 8 Supplement (Civil Cover Sheet) filed by Larry Cochran. Related document #1 . (Attachments: #1 transmittal letter, #2 envelope)(R,Li) |
Filing 7 Emergency Motion (Request) for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. (S,Ke) |
Filing 6 Notice of Intent to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Larry Cochran. (M,R) |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR Notice of Intent to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Larry Cochran. (M,R) Modified on 10/5/2020 to denote filing error (M,R). |
Filing 4 Request for Court to Direct Clerk to Request All Petitioner's Account Information filed by Larry Cochran. (S,Ke) Modified text on 9/1/2020 (S,SR). |
Filing 3 Request for Waiver of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by Larry Cochran. (S,Ke) Modified text on 9/1/2020 (S,SR). |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Larry Cochran. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Inmate Inquiry)(S,Ke) |
Filing 1 Emergency Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Larry Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Detailed Account of Cochran's Compassionate Release Request with the B.O.P., #2 Exhibit B - B.O.P. Incident Report, #3 Exhibit C - B.O.P. DHO Report, #4 Exhibit D - Accuser's Evidence, #5 Exhibit E - B.O.P. Program Statement No. 5050.50, Compassionate Release, Section 8. Approval of Request and Section 9. Denial of Request Document #7, Email Request to Staff Document #8) (S,Ke) |
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (S,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,Ke) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a)., Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Larry Cochran #08893-027, ELKTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P.O. BOX 10, LISBON, OH 44432 on 9/1/2020. Related document(s) #1 . (S,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cochran v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Larry Cochran | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Mark K. Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.