Walker v. Eppinger
Petitioner: Charles Walker
Respondent: Warden LaShann Eppinger
Case Number: 4:2020cv02587
Filed: November 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: J Philip Calabrese
Referring Judge: Carmen E Henderson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Order (non-document) of case reassignment to Judge J. Philip Calabrese pursuant to General Order 2020-27. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on December 7, 2020. (M,MT)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Remark by Clerk re Service Upon U.S. Government Defendant. If a U.S. Government agency or officer is sued, you must provide summons for that defendant, for the U.S. Attorney General (Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530) and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio (801 West Superior Avenue, Suite 400, Cleveland, OH 44113-1852). (W,K)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Charles Walker. This matter is referred for a report and recommendation decision to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson, which referral shall include the issuance by the Magistrate Judge for any order requiring the respondent to answer, service of the petition or any appropriate order directed to the matter pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing Habeas Corpus cases. LR 71.1(f). Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 11/19/2020. (R,Sh)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 11/19/2020. (R,Sh)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Supplement to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Charles Walker. Related document(s) #1 . (Hibbard, Allison)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,Ke)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). (S,Ke)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (S,Ke)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (S,Ke)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid $ 5, receipt number AOHNDC-10428039.. Filed by Charles Walker. (Hibbard, Allison)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Eppinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Walker
Represented By: Allison F. Hibbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden LaShann Eppinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?