Root v. Nelnet
Plaintiff: Christopher Root
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc and Nelnet
Case Number: 4:2020cv02742
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2021 Filing 8 Notice of Service of Civil Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosure filed by Nelnet. (VanSlyke, David)
February 3, 2021 Filing 7 Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures on February 3, 2021 filed by Christopher Root. Related document(s) #6 .(Zuzolo, Philip s/ of Patrick Duricy)
January 11, 2021 Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with Telephonic Case Management Conference to be held on 2/17/2021 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Benita Y. Pearson. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference call and contact Chambers directly at (330) 884-7435, with all participants on the line. The Court requires personal participation of parties at the Case Management Conference, even when the conference is telephonic. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachment No. 1, #2 Attachment No. 2, #3 Attachment No. 3, #4 Attachment No. 4, #5 Attachment No. 5) (JLG)
December 29, 2020 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Nelnet Diversified Solutions, LLC for Nelnet, Inc filed by Nelnet, Inc. (VanSlyke, David)
December 29, 2020 Notice by Clerk that Nelnet, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (S,Ke)
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 Answer to Complaint filed by Nelnet, Inc. (VanSlyke, David)
December 10, 2020 Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,Ke)
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Nelnet, Inc. Related document(s) #1 .(VanSlyke, David)
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Trumbull County Common Pleas Court, case number 2020 CV 01284 Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-10486111. Filed by Nelnet, Inc. (VanSlyke, David) Modified to denote that State Court Complaint is attached as part of the Complaint on 12/29/2020 (S,Ke).
December 10, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,Ke)
December 10, 2020 Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (S,Ke)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Root v. Nelnet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc
Represented By: David L. VanSlyke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelnet
Represented By: David L. VanSlyke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Root
Represented By: Patrick B. Duricy
Represented By: Shayla Schroeder
Represented By: Philip D. Zuzolo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?