Fauvie v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Felicia Fauvie |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
4:2020cv02750 |
December 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Thomas M Parker |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 12/15/2020; the U.S. Attorney General (signed c-19) and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel (signed c-19) on 12/17/2020 by FedEx filed on behalf of Felicia Fauvie. Related document(s) #6 . (L,Br) |
Filing 8 Initial Standing Order (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (S,Ke) |
Filing 7 Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by Felicia Fauvie. Related document(s) #1 .(Shifrin, Debra) |
Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/11/2020. (D,JJ) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,Ke) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Felicia Fauvie. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Felicia Fauvie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Shifrin, Debra) |
Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Fauvie's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/11/2020. (D,JJ) |
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (S,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,Ke) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (S,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fauvie v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Felicia Fauvie | |
Represented By: | Debra S. Shifrin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Cara Staley Rafferty |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.