Bodine Perry PLLC v. Bodine et al
| Bodine Perry PLLC |
| Matthew F. Bodine and Bodine and Company, LLC |
| 4:2022cv00169 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Motion for leave to file sur-reply filed by Plaintiff Bodine Perry PLLC. Related document(s) #9 . (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit Sur-Reply of Plaintiff)(Weber, Ray) |
| Filing 9 Reply to response to #6 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - USPTO Search by Assignor, #2 Exhibit B - USPTO Search by Assignee, #3 Exhibit C - USPTO Search by Assignor/Assignee, #4 Exhibit D - USPTO Search by Registration Number, #5 Exhibit E - Affidavit) (Thompson, J.) |
| Case reassigned to District Judge Charles E. Fleming pursuant to General Order 2022-07. Related document(s) #6 . (M,KS) |
| Filing 8 Opposition to #6 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Bodine Perry PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4 - Assignment confirmation receipt, #2 Exhibit 4-1 - Electronic TM Assignment System, #3 Exhibit 5 - Assignment Agreement_Redacted, #4 Exhibit 6 - Joinder, #5 Exhibit 7 - TM Assign. Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit 8 - Bodine Perry website pages)(Weber, Ray) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bodine and Company, LLC. (Thompson, J.) |
| Filing 6 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with memorandum in support filed by Matthew F. Bodine, Bodine and Company, LLC. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Thompson, J.) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Bodine and Company, LLC on 2/5/2022, filed on behalf of Bodine Perry PLLC Related document(s) #4 . (P,G) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Matthew F. Bodine, Bodine and Company, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # Matthew Bodine 7017 2620 0000 9273 0145 and Bodine and Company, LLC 7017 2620 0000 9273 0138. (P,G) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Matthew F. Bodine, Bodine and Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ju) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Weber, Ray) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Weber, Ray) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand for Trademark Infringement, Breach of Contract, Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Deceptive Trade Practices, and Tortious Interference With Business against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11247368. Filed by Bodine Perry PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS), #2 Exhibit 2 - Sec. 2.5 Company Property, #3 Exhibit 3 - Trademark Assignment Agreement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Matthew F. Bodine, #6 Summons Bodine and Company, LLC) (Weber, Ray) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (D,Ju) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
