Tutt v. Garza
Petitioner: Michael Tutt
Respondent: F. Garza and Warden F. Garza
Case Number: 4:2022cv00508
Filed: March 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Judgment Entry: For the reasons set forth in the contemporaneously filed Memorandum Opinion and Order, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied and this action is hereby dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 5/12/2022. (E,CK)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied, and this action is hereby dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Sara Lioi on 5/12/2022. (E,CK)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Copy of #3 Memorandum Opinion and Order and #4 Judgment Entry mailed to Michael Tutt #31842-074 at F.C.I. Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432 on 5/12/2022. (E,CK)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Supplement, Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Michael Tutt. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(M,KS)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Financial Transaction in the amount of $5.00 received from Michael Tutt. Receipt #14660137912. Related document(s) #1 . (M,KS)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee paid. Filed by Michael Tutt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Habeas Petition, #2 Appendix 1-19, #3 Envelope) (M,KS)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,KS)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition, an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Michael Tutt, #31842-074 at F.C.I. Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432 on 03/31/2022. Related document(s) #1 . (M,KS)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (M,KS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tutt v. Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Tutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: F. Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden F. Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?