U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. City of Youngstown, et al
| U.S. Specialty Insurance Company |
| City of Youngstown and Cheryl Durig |
| 4:2022cv00749 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with telephonic case management conference to be held on 8/3/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge John R. Adams. Judge John R. Adams on 7/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, #2 Local Rule 30.1, #3 Magistrate Consent Form, #4 Budget, #5 ECF Policies and Procedures)(L,J)
|
|
Filing 8
Marginal Entry Order granting Plaintiff's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #6 Motion to stay . Response due on or before 8/8/22. Judge John R. Adams on 6/30/22.(K,C)
|
|
Filing 7
Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 8, 2022 to file response/reply to #6 Motion to stay filed by Plaintiff U.S. Specialty Insurance Company. Related document(s) #6 . (Campbell, Drew)
|
|
Filing 6
Motion to stay filed by Defendant City of Youngstown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Judgment Entry of May 12, 2022, #2 Exhibit Notice of Appeal)(Faust, Laura)
|
|
Filing 5
Answer and Defenses to Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, City of Youngstown's, Counterclaim filed by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company. Related document(s) #4 . (Campbell, Drew)
|
|
Filing 4
Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against U.S. Specialty Insurance Company filed by City of Youngstown. (Faust, Laura)
|
|
Filing 3
Return of Service by personal service executed upon City of Youngstown on 5/11/2022, filed on behalf of U.S. Specialty Insurance Company (Campbell, Drew)
|
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon City of Youngstown and Cheryl Durig. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,M)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11411655. Filed by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons: City of Youngstown, #3 Summons: Cheryl Durig, #4 Exhibit A-1 - Policy redacted (part 1), #5 Exhibit A-2 - Policy redacted (part 2), #6 Exhibit A-3 - Policy redacted (part 3), #7 Exhibit A-4 Policy redacted (part 4), #8 Exhibit B - Underlying Complaint, #9 Exhibit C - Underlying Docket, #10 Exhibit D - City's Answer & Affirmative Defenses, #11 Exhibit E - 03-19-21 Order, #12 Exhibit F - Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Jdgmt, #13 Exhibit G - 12-02-21 Order, #14 Exhibit H - City's Motion for Summary Jdgmt Brief, #15 Exhibit I - Plaintiff's Motion to Strike or Deny, #16 Exhibit J - 01-12-22 Hearing Transcript, #17 Exhibit K - Plaintiff's Combined Opposition Brief, #18 Exhibit L - 01-12-22 Orders, #19 Exhibit M - Motion to Extend Case Mgmt. Dates and Continue Trial, #20 Exhibit N - Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, #21 Exhibit O - 04-19-22 Order, #22 Exhibit P - 04-28-22 Order, #23 Exhibit Q - City's Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, #24 Exhibit R - 04-07-22 Letter) (Campbell, Drew)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (G,M)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (G,M)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
