Mullen v. Fay Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff: James Mullen
Defendant: Fay Servicing, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00798
Filed: May 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with Telephonic Case Management Conference to be held on 8/15/2022 at 2:00 p.m. before Judge Benita Y. Pearson. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference call and contact Chambers directly at (330) 884-7435, with all participants on the line. The Court requires personal participation of parties at the Case Management Conference, even when the conference is telephonic. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Attachment No. 1, #2 Attachment No. 2, #3 Attachment No. 3, #4 Attachment No. 4, #5 Attachment No. 5) (JLG)
June 17, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 07/19/2022 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Fay Servicing, LLC. (O'Conner, Nicholas)
June 17, 2022 Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Abigail Van Hook filed by on behalf of Fay Servicing, LLC. (Van Hook, Abigail)
June 17, 2022 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Nicholas D. O'Conner filed by on behalf of Fay Servicing, LLC. (O'Conner, Nicholas)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time until 7/19/2022 to Answer Complaint. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/17/2022. (JLG)
May 31, 2022 Filing 3 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Fay Servicing, LLC on 5/27/2022, filed on behalf of James Mullen Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (Flick, Brian)
May 17, 2022 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Fay Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,M)
May 17, 2022 Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (G,M)
May 17, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (G,M)
May 16, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint for Damages with jury demand against Fay Servicing, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11423796. Filed by James Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - TPP, #2 Exhibit 2 - Executed TPP and Check, #3 Exhibit 3 - TPP Payments, #4 Exhibit 4 - Default Letter, #5 Exhibit 5 - Payment Rejection, #6 Exhibit 6 - NOE 1, #7 Exhibit 7 - NOE Acknowledgment, #8 Exhibit 8 - NOE 2, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Proposed Summons) (Flick, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mullen v. Fay Servicing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Mullen
Represented By: Brian D. Flick
Represented By: Daniel M. Solar
Represented By: Marc E. Dann
Represented By: Michael A. Smith, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fay Servicing, LLC
Represented By: Abigail Van Hook
Represented By: Nicholas D. O'Conner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?