Marriott v. Pershing et al.
| Ashley M. Marriott |
| Deputy Jonathan Persing, Sergeant Touville and Mahoning County, Ohio |
| 4:2022cv00965 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Ashley M. Marriott. filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David)
|
Filing 10
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Ashley M. Marriott. filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David)
|
Filing 9
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Ashley M. Marriott. filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David)
|
Filing 8
Attorney Appearance by Helen K. Sudhoff filed by on behalf of Mahoning County, Ohio, Jonathan Persing, Touville. (Sudhoff, Helen)
|
Filing 7
Attorney Appearance by Daniel T. Downey filed by on behalf of Mahoning County, Ohio, Jonathan Persing, Touville. (Downey, Daniel)
|
Filing 6
Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Mahoning County, Ohio, c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department on 6/10/2022, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David).
|
Filing 5
Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Sergeant Touville, c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department on 6/9/2022, filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David).
|
Filing 4
Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Deputy Jonathan Persing, c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department on 6/10/2022, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Ashley M. Marriott (Engler, David).
|
Filing 3
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Mahoning County, Ohio c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department, Jonathan Persing c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department, Sergeant Touville c/o Mahoning County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ju)
|
Filing 2
Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Ashley M. Marriott. Related document(s) #1 . (Engler, David)
|
Notice to Attorney Jennifer J. Ciccone. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo)
|
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (D,Ju)
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (D,Ju)
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Mahoning County, Ohio, Deputy Jonathan Persing, Sergeant (first name unknown) Touville. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11456448. Filed by Ashley Marriott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet (blank, resubmitted as ECF #2, #2 Summons Deputy Jonathan Persing, #3 Summons Sergeant Touville, #4 Summons Mahoning County, Ohio) (Engler, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.