Cooley v. Chirag Enterprise, LLC et al
| Christopher Cooley |
| Chirag Enterprise, LLC doing business as Wagon Wheel Motel, Nasrin Rahman and Akm M Rahman |
| 4:2023cv00185 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
Order granting 23 Motion for Default Judgment in favor of Christopher Cooley against Defendants Akm M. Rahman and Nasrin Rahman. The Court finds that Defendants have violated the ADA by failing to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)( A)(ii). Plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to the injunctive relief requested in his motion for default judgment. Accordingly, Defendants are ordered to modify their policies and procedures to allow service animals at the motel, and to take steps to ensure that the parties they authorize or contract with to use their property are making appropriate modifications to their pertinent policies and procedures. Further, Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiff Christopher Cooley and against Defendants Akm M. Rahman and Nasrin Rahman in the amount of $4,340 for attorney's fees and $681 for other litigation costs and expenses. A separate judgment entry will be docketed. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/5/2023. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
