Mirafuentes-Valdez v. Warden, FCI Elkton
| Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez and Warden, FCI Elkton |
| 4:2023cv01289 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Order: Pro se Petitioner has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Doc. No. #1 ). However, he has not paid the filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Petitioner is hereby ordered, within 30 days of the date of this Order, either to pay the filing fee $5 or to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis in order to proceed with the case. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the action without further notice. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit). (D,JJ)
|
|
Copy of #2 Order, mailed to Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez #17192-089 at Federal Correctional Institution Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432 on 8/25/2023. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody pursuant to First Step Act of 2018. Filing fee not paid. Filed by Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit 1 - Judgment Page 1 Dated 1-26-2021, #4 Exhibit 2 - Judgment Page 2 Dated 1-26-2021, #5 Exhibit 3 - Judgment Page 3 Dated 1-26-2021, #6 Exhibit 4 - Individualized Needs Plan Dated 3-30-2023, #7 Exhibit 5 - Individualized Needs Plan Dated 3-30-2023, #8 Exhibit 6 - Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Administrative Removal Order, #9 Exhibit 7 - Certificate of Service Dated 4-7-2023, #10 Exhibit 8 - Continuation Page for Form I-851, #11 Exhibit 9 - Final Administrative Removal Order Dated 4-17-2023, #12 Exhibit 10 - Sentencing Monitor Computation Data Dated 4-17-2023, #13 Exhibit 11 - Correspondence Dated 4-22-2023, #14 Envelope) (R,AP)
|
|
Judge James R. Knepp, II assigned to case. (R,AP)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (R,AP)
|
|
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) mailed to Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez, 17192-089, Federal Correctional Institution Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432 on 6/29/2023. Related document(s) #1 . (R,AP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mirafuentes-Valdez v. Warden, FCI Elkton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Warden, FCI Elkton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
