Robinson v. Adult & Teen Challenge et al.
| Monty Robinson |
| Adult & Teen Challenge, Joey Vorheez, Bob Pavlich, Alisha Tantili, David Chadwell, D. Ditzler, A. Traficanti, C. Righettetti-Rimedo and Hope Counseling |
| 4:2023cv02248 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Monty Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Letters in Support, #2 Envelope)(G,M) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Monty Robinson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Prisoner, #2 Account Statement, #3 Envelope)(G,M) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Violations of Civil Rights against Adult & Teen Challenge, David Chadwell, D. Ditzler, Hope Counseling, Bob Pavlich, C. Righettetti-Rimedo, Alisha Tantili, A. Traficanti, Joey Vorheez. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Monty Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 USM 285 Form and Summons, #3 Brief in Support/Complaint, #4 Envelope). (G,M) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (G,M) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (G,M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
