Sanchez v. County of Mahoning et al.
Obed I. Sanchez |
County of Mahoning, Jerry Greene, Sheriff, Warden Cappibianca, Assistant Warden Lt. Diangelo, Kountz, D. Ditzler, C. Rimedio, Righettetti, Mr. Kountz and Lt. Myers |
4:2023cv02249 |
November 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Benita Y Pearson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Obed I. Sanchez. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 request for certified account statement, #2 Mahoning County Sheriff's Office trust account summary, #3 affidavit of prisoner, #4 envelope)(D,Ju) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2023: #5 pages 6 and 8 of Mahoning County Sheriff's Office trust account summary) (D,Ju). |
Filing 1 Complaint for violation of civil rights against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 4:23cv2136. Filed by Obed I. Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Complaint, #2 civil cover sheet, #3 summons and USM 285 form, #4 envelope). (D,Ju) |
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (D,Ju) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.