Scott et al. v. OHNH Emp, LLC
| Ashley Scott and Falona Gavins |
| OHNH Emp, LLC d/b/a Addison Healthcare Center and OHNH Emp, LLC doing business as Addison Healthcare Center |
| 4:2023cv02380 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. OHNH Emp, LLC waiver sent on 12/14/2023, answer due 2/12/2024 filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sams, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons issued or provided. (G,M) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (G,M) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (G,M) |
| Filing 1 Collective Action Complaint for unpaid overtime wages with jury demand against OHNH Emp, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12316040. Filed by Ashley Scott, Falona Gavins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Ashley Scott Consent to Become a Party Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B - Falona Gavins Consent to Become a Party Plaintiff, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (Sams, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
