Maurice:Jones v. Girard Water Department et al.
Robert- Maurice:Jones doing business as Robert Jones |
Girard Water Department and Jerome Lambert doing business as Director |
4:2023cv02409 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Other Fraud |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Robert- Maurice:Jones. (Attachments: #1 Evidence-Disconnection Notice, #2 Envelope)(F,AW) |
Filing 3 Notice of U.S. Marshal Form Return filed by Robert- Maurice:Jones. (H,SP) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Robert- Maurice:Jones. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(G,M) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Girard Water Department, Jerome Lambert. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Robert- Maurice:Jones. (Attachments: #1 Alias Summons and USM 285 Form, #2 Evidence: Certificate of Default/Opportunity to Cure, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Evidence: Document filed in Mahoning County Common Pleas, #5 Evidence: Invoice, #6 Additional Documents in Support, #7 Envelope) (G,M) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (G,M) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (G,M) |
Copy of non-doc Order mailed to Robert- Maurice:Jones 111 Aurora Circle Youngstown, OH 44505 on 12/19/2023. (P,K) |
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/19/2023. (P,K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.