Altronic LLC v. MotorTech GmbH, et al.
Plaintiff: Altronic LLC
Defendant: MotorTech GmbH, Jane Doe and John Doe
Case Number: 4:2024cv00118
Filed: January 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Filing 12 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Altronic LLC. MotorTech GmbH waiver sent on 2/23/2024, answer due 5/23/2024 filed on behalf of Altronic LLC (McDermott, Brendan)
February 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order granting #9 Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Joshua A. Hartman for Defendant MotorTech GmbH. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/26/2024. (JLG)
February 26, 2024 Filing 10 Unopposed Motion to stay pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659(a) filed by Defendant MotorTech GmbH. (Rodman, Rachael)
February 26, 2024 Filing 9 Motion for attorney Joshua A. Hartman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12424681, filed by Defendant MotorTech GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of J. Hartman, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing)(Rodman, Rachael)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order granting #6 , #7 Motions for Appearance Pro Hac Vice by Attorneys Stephen F.W. Ball, Jr. and Brendan McDermott for Plaintiff Altronic LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/20/2024. (JLG)
February 16, 2024 Filing 7 Motion for attorney Brendan McDermott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12413772, filed by Plaintiff Altronic LLC. (Attachments: #1 McDermott Statement in Support, #2 McDermott Certificate of Good Standing)(Mikes, Emily)
February 16, 2024 Filing 6 Motion for attorney Stephen F.W. Ball, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12413771, filed by Plaintiff Altronic LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ball Statement in Support, #2 Ball Certificate of Good Standing)(Mikes, Emily)
January 22, 2024 Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon MotorTech GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,M)
January 22, 2024 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (G,M)
January 22, 2024 Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (G,M)
January 19, 2024 Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Altronic LLC. (Mikes, Emily)
January 19, 2024 Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Altronic LLC. (Mikes, Emily)
January 19, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Altronic LLC. (Mikes, Emily)
January 19, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint for Patent Infringement with jury demand against Jane Doe, John Doe, MotorTech GmbH. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12365890.. Filed by Altronic LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1. US Patent 7401603, #3 Summons) (Mikes, Emily)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Altronic LLC v. MotorTech GmbH, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Altronic LLC
Represented By: Emily K. Mikes
Represented By: Brendan G McDermott
Represented By: Stephen F.W. Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MotorTech GmbH
Represented By: Joshua A. Hartman
Represented By: Rachael L. Rodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?