Nielsen v. Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc. et al.
| Mandy Nielsen |
| Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc. and Angelo Locastro |
| 4:2024cv00579 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Angelo Locastro, Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,M) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (G,M) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (G,M) |
| Filing 4 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons Angelo Locastro filed by Mandy Nielsen. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (Makridis, Irene) |
| Filing 3 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons on Defendant Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc filed by Mandy Nielsen. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (Makridis, Irene) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Mandy Nielsen. Related document(s) #1 .(Makridis, Irene) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Seven Seventeen Credit Union and Angelo Locastro. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12481446.. Filed by Mandy Nielsen. (Makridis, Irene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
