Johnson v. Warden Davis
Petitioner: Trejuan Johnson
Respondent: Warden Anthony Davis
Case Number: 5:2024cv01137
Filed: July 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: J Philip Calabrese
Referring Judge: Darrell A Clay
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2024 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Counsel Hilda Rosenberg filed by on behalf of Anthony Davis. (Rosenberg, Hilda)
August 14, 2024 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order Respondent is to file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within 60 days from the date of this Order. The Answer must comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and must address all legal issues raised in the petition. Petitioner is to file a Traverse to Return of Writ within 30 days from date Respondent files its Return of Writ. Respondent may file a Sur-Reply within 15 days from the date Petitioner files the Traverse. Respondent should do so only when the Traverse raises issues or arguments that were not originally addressed in the Return of Writ. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 8/14/2024. (R,Ke)
August 14, 2024 Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, emailed to the Office of the Attorney General on 8/14/2024. (R,Ke)
August 14, 2024 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on August 14, 2024. (Y,A)
July 18, 2024 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Trejuan Johnson. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Kendall, Kimberly)
July 8, 2024 Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi on 7/8/2024. (D,Ju)
July 8, 2024 Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without a completed Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Counsel was contacted. Related document(s) #1 . (D,Ju)
July 8, 2024 Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (D,Ju)
July 8, 2024 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (D,Ju)
July 5, 2024 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid $ 5. Filed by Trejuan Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Supplement - Petition form Ground 5 through Ground 9, #2 Brief in Support, #3 Civil Cover Sheet (incomplete) (Kendall, Kimberly) Modified on 7/8/2024 counsel contacted regarding code change to 5, incomplete civil cover sheet and incomplete signature block (D,Ju).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Warden Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Trejuan Johnson
Represented By: Kimberly Kendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Anthony Davis
Represented By: Hilda Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?