Johnson v. Warden Davis
Trejuan Johnson |
Warden Anthony Davis |
5:2024cv01137 |
July 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
J Philip Calabrese |
Darrell A Clay |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Counsel Hilda Rosenberg filed by on behalf of Anthony Davis. (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order Respondent is to file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within 60 days from the date of this Order. The Answer must comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and must address all legal issues raised in the petition. Petitioner is to file a Traverse to Return of Writ within 30 days from date Respondent files its Return of Writ. Respondent may file a Sur-Reply within 15 days from the date Petitioner files the Traverse. Respondent should do so only when the Traverse raises issues or arguments that were not originally addressed in the Return of Writ. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 8/14/2024. (R,Ke) |
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, emailed to the Office of the Attorney General on 8/14/2024. (R,Ke) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on August 14, 2024. (Y,A) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Trejuan Johnson. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Kendall, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi on 7/8/2024. (D,Ju) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without a completed Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Counsel was contacted. Related document(s) #1 . (D,Ju) |
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (D,Ju) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid $ 5. Filed by Trejuan Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Supplement - Petition form Ground 5 through Ground 9, #2 Brief in Support, #3 Civil Cover Sheet (incomplete) (Kendall, Kimberly) Modified on 7/8/2024 counsel contacted regarding code change to 5, incomplete civil cover sheet and incomplete signature block (D,Ju). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Warden Davis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Trejuan Johnson | |
Represented By: | Kimberly Kendall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Anthony Davis | |
Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.