Fortson v. Fender - Custodian NEOCC
| Laverne Eugene Fortson |
| Warden D. Fender - Custodian NEOCC |
| 4:2025cv00639 |
| April 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Supplement - civil cover sheet to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Laverne Eugene Fortson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 envelope)(D,Ju)
|
|
Filing 3
Judgment Entry that Petitioner's petition is dismissed without prejudice. Further, that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Courts decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge John R. Adams on 4/9/25. (K,C)
|
|
Filing 2
Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the Petitioner's petition without prejudice. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge John R. Adams on 4/9/25. (K,C)
|
|
Copy of #2 Memorandum Opinion and Order and #3 Judgment mailed to Laverne Fortson at NEOCC on 4/9/25. Related document(s) #2 , #3 . (K,C)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee paid. 5.00. Receipt # 6961. Filed by Laverne Eugene Fortson. (Attachments: #1 List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1. Complaint - Charge 1. City of Akron, #3 Exhibit 2. Complaint - Charge 2. City of Akron, #4 Exhibit 3. Supervised Release Violation, #5 Exhibit 4. Bond Receipt, #6 Exhibit 5. Violation Denial, #7 Exhibit 6. Initial Indictment, #8 Exhibit 7. Superseding Indictment, #9 Exhibit 8. Search Warrant Application, #10 Exhibit 9. Affidavit of Facts, #11 Exhibit 10. Inmate Grievance, #12 Exhibit 11. Transcript of Pretrial Hearing, #13 Exhibit 12. Declaration of Defense, #14 envelope). (D,Th)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (D,Th)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (D,Th)
|
|
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Petition and blank Civil Cover Sheet was mailed to Levern Eugene Fortson, 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, Ohio 44505. Related document(s) #1 . (D,Th)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fortson v. Fender - Custodian NEOCC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Laverne Eugene Fortson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden D. Fender - Custodian NEOCC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
