Bishop v. Washam
| James K. Bishop |
| Scott A. Washam |
| 4:2026cv00616 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Judgment Entry: For the reasons set forth in the contemporaneously filed #3 Memorandum Opinion and Order, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Further, the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 3/25/2026. (S,SR)
|
|
Filing 3
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's #1 complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 3/25/2026. (S,SR)
|
|
Copy of #4 Judgment, #3 Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to James K. Bishop #704-375 at Noble Correctional Institution 15708 McConnellsville Rd. Caldwell, OH 43724 on 3/25/2026. (S,SR)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion (Affidavit) to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff James K. Bishop. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support and Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #2 Inmate Demand Statement, #3 Envelope)(B,Ch)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Scott A. Washam. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by James K. Bishop. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Common Pleas Court Judgment, #3 Common Pleas Court Legal Analysis, #4 Common Pleas Court Motion for Relief from Judgment, #5 Ohio Appeals Court Opinion and Judgment, #6 Summons, #7 USM-285, #8 Cover Letter, #9 Request for Service by Mail, #10 Envelope) (B,Ch)
|
|
Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (B,Ch)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (B,Ch)
|
|
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court., Copy of #1 Complaint, and blank Civil Cover sheet mailed to James K. Bishop 704-375 Noble Correctional Institution 15708 McConnellsville Rd. Caldwell, OH 43724 on 3/16/2026. Related document(s) #1 . (B,Ch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bishop v. Washam | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James K. Bishop | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scott A. Washam | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
